In my newest evaluation of security studies in the world of combative sports, a recent short article was published in the British Journal of sports medicine discovering concussion ‘preventing’ sports devices has ‘no effect’.
In the recent study, titled “Current specify of Concussion Prevention Strategies: a systemic evaluation as well as meta-analysis of prospective, managed studies” the authors assessed 14 studies evaluating the impacts of “novel protective equipment“. They wrapped up that while some devices was efficient in decreasing “superficial head injury” (think cuts as well as bruises) when it concerned concussion prevention the devices “showed no impact of intervention“.
The study’s full abstract is reproduced below:
Objective The objective of the present evaluation was to systematically identify, assess as well as synthesise trials that analyze concussion prevention through equipment, academic programmes as well as training programmes.
Data sources PubMed as well as EBSCO hold (CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus).
Eligibility requirements for choosing studies The electronic databases PubMed as well as EBSCO were searched utilizing the phrases: concussion prevention equipment, concussion prevention trainingand concussion prevention education. included studies utilised a potential research study style to assess the preventative impact of: (1) equipment, (2) training or (3) academic programmes on the incidence of concussions in comparison to a manage group.
Data extraction Demographic data as well as intervention techniques were recorded. intervention as well as manage group concussion rates as well as superficial head injury rates were extracted as well as integrated utilizing random-effects family member danger meta-analysis.
Results 14 studies assessed interventions Camiseta Selección de fútbol de Serbia of book protective equipment. One potential investigation assessed an academic programme. Camiseta CF Monterrey The family member danger of concussion for participants enrolled in the interventional arms of trials was not considerably different from that in common method arms (RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.11, χ2=1.8, p=0.17; I2=85.3%, 95% CI 71.5% to 90.8%). The family member danger of concussion for participants using protective devices (ie, headgear, full deal with shields) Camiseta AS Roma family member to their counterparts using common or no equipment, calculated from seven offered reports, showed no impact of intervention (RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.20, χ2=1.06, p=0.30; I2=86.7%, 95% CI 73.3% to 91.8%). The family member danger of superficial head injury for participants using protective devices family member to their counterparts, calculated from three reports, showed a considerable danger reduction (RR=0.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.56, χ2=34.13, p<0.0001; I2=53.1%, 95% CI 0% to 85.2%). Conclusions potential managed studies suggest that specific protective devices may avoid superficial head injury, however these products are suboptimal for concussion prevention in sport. Share this: Twitter Facebook Like this: Like Loading... Related Study requires requirement of much more Boxing Headgear Concussion DataAugust 3, 2021In "Safety Studies" Study – growing evidence of Psychiatric Consequences complying with sport Concussion in AdultsApril 26, 2016In "Safety Studies" Study – very first competitor To Be Concussed Loses 98% of the TimeDecember 2, 2020In "Safety Studies"